The effect of co-induction of fentanyl compared to oxycodone on anesthetic depth and hemodynamic status in surgical patients under general anesthesia at Prof. Ngoerah Denpasar General Hospital

Main Article Content

Aninda Tanggono

Keywords

Anesthesia co-induction, Oxycodone, Fentanyl, Anesthetic depth, Hemodynamic stability

Abstract

Introduction: Laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation during general anesthesia can elicit sympathetic responses, including elevated blood pressure and heart rate. Fentanyl and oxycodone are opioids used for anesthesia co-induction to attenuate this response. This study aims to compare the co-induction effects of fentanyl and oxycodone on anesthesia depth and hemodynamic stability.


Methods: This was a prospective observational study involving 40 adult patients with ASA I–II status undergoing general anesthesia at RSUP Prof. Ngoerah Denpasar. Subjects were randomized into two groups: fentanyl 2 µg/kg BW and oxycodone 0.2 mg/kg BW. All patients underwent standard induction protocols. The depth of anesthesia was assessed using the CONOX monitor (qCON), while hemodynamic status was evaluated through blood pressure, heart rate, and stroke volume via USCOM. Data were analyzed using t-tests and Mann-Whitney U tests with significance set at p<0.05.


Results: There were no statistically significant differences in mean arterial pressure or heart rate between the groups (p>0.05), indicating similar hemodynamic responses. However, stroke volume reduction after intubation was significantly less in the oxycodone group (median ΔSV 3 vs 11.5; p<0.001). Additionally, qCON values showed better anesthesia depth with oxycodone (51.0 ± 5.8 vs 60.5 ± 7.5; p<0.001).


Conclusion: Oxycodone co-induction results in better anesthesia depth and equal or superior hemodynamic stability compared to fentanyl. Oxycodone may be considered an effective alternative for co-induction in general anesthesia.

Abstract 85 | pdf Downloads 47

References

1. Ramirez G, Campanero MA, Zaldua A, Jauregizar N. Problems Related to Endotracheal Intubation as an Input for the Design of a New Endotracheal Tube. Med Devices Evid Res. 2024 Oct;Volume 17:349–67.
2. Tshering U, Wangdi S, LeVine S, Tenzin K, Choeda T, Yeshi S. Practice and outcomes of endotracheal intubation in the emergency department: a retrospective observational study at a single institution in Bhutan. Discov Med. 2024 Nov 15;1(1):117.
3. Hickey AJ, Cummings MJ, Short B, Brodie D, Panzer O, Madahar P, et al. Approach to the Physiologically Challenging Endotracheal Intubation in the Intensive Care Unit. Respir Care. 2023 Oct 1;68(10):1438–48.
4. Teong CY, Huang CC, Sun FJ. The Haemodynamic Response to Endotracheal Intubation at Different Time of Fentanyl Given During Induction: A Randomised Controlled Trial. Sci Rep. 2020 June 1;10(1):8829.
5. Ji J, Langley B, Zordan R, Van Dijk J, Thies HHG, Brahmbhatt A, et al. Heart rate responses in critical care trainees during airway intubation: a comparison between the simulated and clinical environments. BMC Emerg Med. 2023 June 10;23(1):66.
6. Mihalj M, Karlović Z, Vladić-Spaić D, Matić B, Mikulić I, Mikulić V, et al. Effects of midazolam co-induction to general anesthesia: A randomized clinical trial. Medicine (Baltimore). 2022 Nov 11;101(45):e31400.
7. Martins TP, Souza DM, Souza DM. Use of multimodal anesthesia in the treatment of postoperative pain. Braz J Pain [Internet]. 2023 [cited 2025 July 31];6(4). Available from: https://www.scielo.br/j/brjp/a/v49pgDrPJtwzx3S8GBNsVHq/?lang=en
8. Viteri Hinojosa AS. Multimodal anesthesia: integrated strategies to improve pain management and recovery: a literature review. Portal SOAR Sapienza Open Access Repos. 2024 May 8;7(EBOA7):90–7.
9. Myles PS. Depth of anaesthesia monitoring: updated evidence. Comment on Br J Anaesth 2023; 131: 196–9. Br J Anaesth. 2023 Nov;131(5):e145–7.
10. Musizza B, Ribaric S. Monitoring the Depth of Anaesthesia. Sensors. 2010 Dec 3;10(12):10896–935.
11. Suzuki J, El-Haddad S. A review: Fentanyl and non-pharmaceutical fentanyls. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2017 Feb;171:107–16.
12. Choi BM. A new therapeutic option for postoperative pain management with oxycodone HCI injection. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2016;69(3):211.
13. Lee YS, Baek CW, Kim DR, Kang H, Choi GJ, Park YH, et al. Comparison of hemodynamic response to tracheal intubation and postoperative pain in patients undergoing closed reduction of nasal bone fracture under general anesthesia: a randomized controlled trial comparing fentanyl and oxycodone. BMC Anesthesiol. 2016 Dec;16(1):115.
14. Bujedo, Md BM, Santos, Md SG, Azpiazu, Md AU. A review of epidural and intrathecal opioids used in the management of postoperative pain. J Opioid Manag. 2012 May 1;8(3):177–92.
15. Dong P. Effect of oxycodone versus fentanyl for patient-controlled intravenous analgesia after laparoscopic hysteromyomectomy: a single-blind, randomized controlled trial. Sci Rep. 2024;14(1).
16. Park KB, Ann J, Lee H. Effects of different dosages of oxycodone and fentanyl on the hemodynamic changes during intubation. Saudi Med J. 2016 Aug;37(8):847–52.