Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery vs. open thoracotomy in the management of empyema: A Meta-analytical perspective
Main Article Content
Keywords
Empyema, Minimally invasive surgery, Open thoracotomy, Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery
Abstract
Background: Pleural empyema is a serious condition requiring surgical intervention in advanced stages. This systematic review and meta-analysis compared the outcomes of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) and open thoracotomy in the management of pleural empyema.
Method: After performing a systematic search on electronic databases, 15 studies were included with a total of 1,795 patients.
Result: The results demonstrated that VATS was associated with significantly shorter chest tube duration (MD: −2.68 days, 95% CI: −4.22 to −1.13, p < 0.001), reduced rates of prolonged air leak (OR: 0.44, 95% CI: 0.26 to 0.74, p = 0.001), and lower total complications (OR: 0.62, 95% CI: 0.44 to 0.87, p = 0.006). Mortality, reoperation rates, and recurrence rates were comparable between VATS and open thoracotomy, indicating similar efficacy for long-term disease resolution. In conclusion, this analysis highlights the advantages of VATS as a minimally invasive approach, particularly in reducing postoperative morbidity and complications.
Conclusion: Open thoracotomy remains crucial for complex or advanced cases requiring extensive decortication. The findings underscore the importance of individualized surgical decision-making based on disease stage and patient characteristics.
References
2. Sundaralingam A, Banka R, Rahman NM. Management of Pleural Infection. Pulm Ther 2021; 7: 59–74.
3. Steen K, Sørensen J, Christensen M, Petersen RH, Naidu B, Bendixen M et al. Comparison of video assisted thoracoscopic surgery and thoracotomy for treatment of pleural infection stage II and III: a literature review. J Thorac Dis 2023; 15: 6323–6332.
4. Shin JA, Chang YS, Kim TH, Haam SJ, Kim HJ, Ahn CM et al. Surgical decortication as the first-line treatment for pleural empyema. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2013; 145: 933-939.e1.
5. Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 2021; 372. doi:10.1136/bmj.n71.
6. Reichert M, Pösentrup B, Hecker A, Schneck E, Pons-Kühnemann J, Augustin F et al. Thoracotomy versus video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) in stage III empyema—an analysis of 217 consecutive patients. Surg Endosc 2018; 32: 2664–2675.
7. Chan DTL, Sihoe ADL, Chan S, Tsang DSF, Fang B, Lee TW et al. Surgical Treatment for Empyema Thoracis: Is Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery ‘Better’ Than Thoracotomy? Ann Thorac Surg 2007; 84: 225–231.
8. Shahin Y, Duffy J, Beggs D, Black E, Majewski A. Surgical management of primary empyema of the pleural cavity: Outcome of 81 patients. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2010; 10: 565–567.
9. Dokhan LA, Moheb Ibrahim I, Mohammed Abdel Sadek S, Gamal El-din Hagag M. Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery versus Open Decortication in Chronic Pleural Empyema. Egypt Cardiothorac Surg 2022; 4: 68–72.
10. Banik R, Haque AA, Hossain MM, Choudhary AK, Rahman Chisty MM, Rayhan MZ et al. Short-Term Outcome of Video Assisted Thoracoscopic Decortication in Empyema Thoracis. J Curr Adv Med Res 2021; 8: 100–105.
11. Jindal R, Nar A, Mishra A, Singh R, Aggarwal A, Bansal N. Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery versus open thoracotomy in the management of empyema: A comparative study. J Minim Access Surg 2021; 17: 470–478.
12. Waller DA, Rengarajan A. Thoracoscopic decortication: A role for video-assisted surgery in chronic postpneumonic pleural empyema. Ann Thorac Surg 2001; 71: 1813–1816.
13. Hajjar W, Ahmed I, Al-Nassar S, Alsultan R, Alwgait W, Alkhalaf H et al. Video-assisted thoracoscopic decortication for the management of late stage pleural empyema, is it feasible? Ann Thorac Med 2016; 11: 71–78.
14. Podbielski FJ, Maniar HS, Rodriguez HE, Hernan MJ, Vigneswaran WT. Surgical strategy of complex empyema thoracis. JSLS 2000; 4: 287–290.
15. Mackinlay TAA, Lyons GA, Chimondeguy DJ, Barboza Piedras MA, Angaramo G, Emery J. VATS debridement versus thoracotomy in the treatment of loculated postpneumonia empyema. Ann Thorac Surg 1996; 61: 1626–1630.
16. Cardillo G, Carleo F, Carbone L, Di Martino M, Salvadori L, Petrella L et al. Chronic postpneumonic pleural empyema: comparative merits of thoracoscopic versus open decortication. Eur J Cardio-thoracic Surg 2009; 36: 914–918.
17. Muhammad MIA. Management of complicated parapneumonic effusion and empyema using different treatment modalities. Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann 2012; 20: 177–181.
18. Tong BC, Hanna J, Toloza EM, Onaitis MW, D’Amico TA, Harpole DH et al. Outcomes of Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Decortication. Ann Thorac Surg 2010; 89: 220–225.
19. Laohathai S, Sadad Z, Suvarnakich K, Pathonsamit C, Tantraworasin A. Efficacy of the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery program for thoracic surgery in a developing country. Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2023;39(5):476-483. doi:10.1007/s12055-023-01518-3
20. Hossain SS, Jahan FI, Rahman MS, Majumdar MNI, Islam KN. Role of Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery in the Management of Pleural Empyema. J. Armed Forces Med. Coll. 2022;18(1):19-22.
21. Gonfiotti A, Viggiano D, Voltolini L, Bertani A, Bertolaccini L, Crisci R et al. Enhanced recovery after surgery and video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy: the Italian VATS Group surgical protocol. J Thorac Dis 2018; 10: S564–S570.
22. Lardinois D, Gock M, Pezzetta E, Buchli C, Rousson V, Furrer M et al. Delayed referral and gram-negative organisms increase the conversion thoracotomy rate in patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for empyema. Ann Thorac Surg 2005; 79: 1851–1856.
23. Chung JH, Lee SH, Kim KT, Jung JS, Son HS, Sun K. Optimal timing of thoracoscopic drainage and decortication for empyema. Ann Thorac Surg 2014; 97: 224–229.