Mini-Bentall procedure for severe aortic regurgitation and root dilation: a case report of rapid recovery, and excellent outcomes

Main Article Content

I Komang Adhi Parama Harta
I Putu Sakamekya Wicakasana Sujaya

Keywords

mini-bentall procedure, minimally invasive, aortic, surgery, replacement

Abstract

Introduction: The Bentall procedure has long been regarded as the gold standard for addressing combined aortic valve and root pathologies. With advancements in minimally invasive cardiac surgery, the mini-Bentall procedure has emerged as a promising alternative to the traditional approach, offering reduced surgical trauma, shorter hospital stays, and improved postoperative recovery.


Case illustration: This report presents the case of a 66-year-old male with severe aortic regurgitation and aortic root dilatation who underwent a successful mini-Bentall procedure. Preoperative evaluation revealed significant left ventricular dysfunction with an ejection fraction of 30.8%, severe aortic regurgitation, and dilatation of the aortic root. The surgery was performed via a mini-sternotomy approach, with careful resection of the aortic root and valve and replacement with a composite graft. Postoperative recovery was uneventful, with minimal bleeding, no mechanical ventilation required, and a significantly reduced length of hospital stay.


Conclusion: This case highlights the feasibility and benefits of the mini-Bentall procedure as a less invasive yet effective approach to complex aortic surgery, demonstrating excellent outcomes and rapid recovery.

Abstract 64 | pdf Downloads 37

References

1. Bentall H, De Bono A. A technique for complete replacement of the ascending aorta. Thorax. 1968;23(4):338–9. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/5664694
2. Berretta P, Di Marco L, Pacini D, Cefarelli M, Alfonsi J, Castrovinci S, et al. Reoperations versus primary operation on the aortic root: a propensity score analysis. Eur J Cardio-Thoracic Surg. 2016;ezw250. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezw250
3. Nguyen TC, Terwelp MD, Thourani VH, Zhao Y, Ganim N, Hoffmann C, et al. Clinical trends in surgical, minimally invasive and transcatheter aortic valve replacement†. Eur J Cardio-Thoracic Surg. 2017;51(6):1086–92. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezx008
4. Mikus E, Micari A, Calvi S, Salomone M, Panzavolta M, Paris M, et al. Mini-Bentall: An Interesting Approach for Selected Patients. Innov Technol Tech Cardiothorac Vasc Surg. 2017;12(1):41–5. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/imi.0000000000000337
5. Phan K, Xie A, Di Eusanio M, Yan TD. A Meta-Analysis of Minimally Invasive Versus Conventional Sternotomy for Aortic Valve Replacement. Ann Thorac Surg. 2014;98(4):1499–511. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2014.05.060
6. Levack MM, Aftab M, Roselli EE, Johnston DR, Soltesz EG, Gillinov AM, et al. Outcomes of a Less-Invasive Approach for Proximal Aortic Operations. Ann Thorac Surg. 2017;103(2):533–40. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2016.06.008
7. Shah VN, Kilcoyne MF, Buckley M, Sicouri S, Plestis KA. The mini-Bentall approach: Comparison with full sternotomy. JTCVS Tech. 2021;7:59–66. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34318207
8. Torky MA, Arafat AA, Fawzy HF, Taha AM, Wahby EA, Herijgers P. J-ministernotomy for aortic valve replacement: a retrospective cohort study. Cardiothorac Surg. 2021;29(1). Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s43057-021-00050-7
9. Wachter K, Franke UFW, Yadav R, Nagib R, Ursulescu A, Ahad S, et al. Feasibility and clinical outcome after minimally invasive valve-sparing aortic root replacement. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2016;ivw362. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/icvts/ivw362